I made 6 edits earlier, and 3 were rejected. I can handle 1 or 2 but not 3 out of 6 rejected.
When I arrive here, I see a few questions that can be improved. Sometimes that improvement is a slight rephrasing of the title, other times its a few spelling mistakes and a tag and sometimes it's clarifying the question substantially because it needs to be done for SEO etc. Either way, I won't make an edit I would consider incorrect.
SE recently abolished the convert-to-CW-automatically-after-a-few-edits because they realised that content gets edited substantially all over the network, all of the time.
I believe it's perfectly fine to edit anything as long as the post is noticeably better once you've finished. (Even if its as little as adding line breaks to make it more readable. From one large text block.)
This rejection is clearly incorrect to me, I improved the title and the body, and added two relevant tags.
This edit is arguable but I think it was necessary, I introduced a more focused element to the title (which was implied anyway) and added more substantive questions to the body (what I believe a user may be looking for when they arrive at a question with this title).
If someone asks a question, it needs to ask (or be developed into asking) that question as thoroughly as possible; otherwise how can anyone justify marking another question with an identical title as a duplicate, if it's asking questions that the other one didn't? Then you end up with a bunch of almost duplicates and the site gets messier and messier.
The last rejected edit was controversial, merely because the question itself was controversial. I made a title change because 'Appropriate bathroom manners' to me, means many things - washing your hands; not bugging whoever is in the toilet while you're waiting to use it etc. and because 10 year old is unnecessary in this question, 'young child' might be better for SEO. I also added the most obvious tag that should have been there, and reformatted and slightly rephrased the body a little.
Could a moderator please review them again and provide me feedback on their validity please?